Modernism and Modernist Theology

nicpaton's picture

Modernism: The predominant worldview of the 20th Century, comprising of:


  1. The culmination of the Individual as Ideal, at the expense of Community.
  2. A belief in "Progress": Man's indominitability and superiority in the Order of Things, as represented in his unsustainable exploitation of the Earth.
  3. A faith in technology - abstraction from nature - to provide man's needs.
  4. A hope in a final, universal, and therefore static, solution to mans problems.
  5. A denial that the creative process is ongoing, and that we will forever be faced with the unknown.
  6. An epistemology (theory of knowledge) based in rationality at the expense of emotional intelligence and intuition.
  7. Communication methods based on broadcasting, one to many, one way, rather than through conversation, many to many, many ways.
  8. A thorough quid pro quo economic sense, in a comprehensively monetarised culture, in which the possibility of true giving is eradicated.
  9. An emphasis on Law as opposed to Grace, and the breakdown of trust, as witnessed in obsessive rights protection, overbearing legislation, and litigation.
  10. A misunderstanding and rejection of myth (which is seen as falsehood) whilst at the same time propagating a myth of "Objectivity".
  11. The domination of Literalism and Fundamentalism and an inability to read life and the world poetically and metaphorically.
  12. Is riddled with dualisms, creating false either or dilemmas.

Modernist christian theology therefore:


  1. Places individual salvation above full, cosmic salvation.
  2. Has a domination mentality in terms of church growth. Growth expressed largely in market terms; headcount and income.
  3. Does not have a thorough critique of technology or industry, but accepts its norms without question.
  4. Believes in a systematic, "final" view; this is apparent in an inability to view truth beyond the cannonical Bible.
  5. Harbors hostility towards evolutionary theory or evidence.
  6. Emphasises the bible, doctrine and the pulpit above many other life-giving sacred activities.
  7. Believes in the superiority of the preacher, who broadcasts his teaching in a lecture format, as well as total buy in to television as an appropriate vehicle for spiritual growth.
  8. Buys in to a system of conditional giving, where true generosity of spirit is lost under the defensive politics and economics of orthodoxy.
  9. Places the knowledge of and adherence to doctrines, above all things. A morality of piety undergirds relationships.
  10. Fails to read the Bible as a mythical text, instead presents it as an historical textbook, which it is not, (despite containing many historical references).
  11. Breeds literalism and stifles imagination, defining faith as adherence and conformity to one interpretation rather than authentic, revealed knowledge.
  12. Upholds damaging dualisms: Heaven/Hell, Heaven/Earth, Redeemed/Damned, and Sacred/Secular, which undermine true spirituality.

Comments

Stephen's picture

Where's the Positive?

Ok - so what positive impacts did modernism have on Christian theology? Since all worldviews have a measure of truth or grace in them how has modernism helped the church?

envoy's picture

what do you think?

What do you think? How do you believe modernist has helped the church?

Envoy

nicpaton's picture

scritch scratch...

Stephen: Yes, good question. And one which has me fumbling about for a fair answer. Maybe there is a balanced view, if "balance" in that sense is a good thing; I don't claim to have it.

What is sure is that we have been shaped by modernism. Affluence and education for example has afforded some things; we wouldn't be conversing and blogging without our technology.

I'm quite open to suggestions and educations about the positives of modernity. Anyhow, here's a short list of moderns who have helped me at some point: Francis Schaeffer, C S Lewis, GK Chesterton.

It's an old cliche that a new movement reserves its main antagonism for the outgoing one.

What I do intuit nonetheless, is that we are moving beyond the values I listed, into something qualitatively new. I am driven by hope, vision and enthusiasm, far far more than mere rejection of a system and worldview which no longer provides Life or nurtures Spirit (in my opinion).

Steve Hayes's picture

Modernism and modernity

I think one needs to distinguish between modernity, which is the worldview, and modernism, which is an ideology that propagates the idea that modernity is the best of all possible worldviews.

nicpaton's picture

your dog, typically modern. you, i just can't tell...

Thanks Steve H.
So you are saying worldviews (like modernity) are not consciously held, while modernism is an intentional ideology, and can thus be approached as a set of doctrines. People can get into a tangle when they don't rightly distinguish between their conscious and the unconscious beliefs.

Who in your mind is an example of a modernist, believing that modernity is the best worldview?

envoy's picture

distinction

Nic,

Steve Hayes' distinction between modernity and modernism is an important one to maintain and one and results in a balanced acceptance-critique. This is akin to the distinction between postmodernity and postmodernism - something a number of critiques of EM churches don't maintain. The proverb "don't throw the baby out with the bath water" springs to mind.

We should not make the mistake of viewing the husk and the kernel as synonymous. Modernist evangelicals may've packaged themselves in their culture (and deserve critique for it both when they make the former synonymous with the latter or at least don't permit others to do the same as well as when in doing so they went wrong). Our challenge is similar to theirs, to "retrieve the gospel" and "repeat it as people of our culture".

Modernism enabled exponential progress in the physical and social sciences and in doing so enabled a furthering of the boundaries of community through technology enabling travel and communication.

Envoy

nicpaton's picture

retrieve? repeat?

Ah yes, but this exponential growth in progress also gave us atomic warfare, communism, blanket commodification, unbridled industrialisation, media saturation ...

I'm trying to take your point, however. We owe this online conversation to progress.

Perhaps the most engaging aspect of your comment concerns repeating the gospel AS people of our culture. What do you mean by retrieve, and repeat? Is there anything wrong with modernist evangelicals, who do this within the moderist paradigm? On what basis would one be critical of such a person?

envoy's picture

fair use

Those are really errors of magnitude or scale. I'm not sure they're any badder but am sure they're more acute and widespread than the sins of other cultures.

I would not wish to make blanket-statements about modernist evangelicalism. It's healthier (and friendlier) to critique aspects of modernist Christianity, e.g. its' mutual complicity with western consumerism, its' pharisaism and egocentrism, etc. Their crime is not that they're modernist Christians, just as our crime is not that we're post-mod & -colonial Christians.

Our challenge, like theirs, is to retrieve the actual Gospel - the message of the kingdom of Godde and Jesus the Christ/Saviour/Risen Lord - and then announce it and demonstrate it from within our culture. If anything, their mistakes are learning material for us.

Envoy

Modernism

Thank you so much for that explanation. I am not as well read as I should be.
Also, I found your comments in the SPAM file. I have no idea how they got there. I did, however, read them. Since your post on "Inerrancy" came through, I don't understand how it happened. Still, I'm trying to figure out how to return non-spam to the regular comments area.

nicpaton's picture

Modernism despises tradition

History is more or less bunk. It’s tradition. We don’t want tradition. We want to live in the present and the only history that is worth a tinker’s damn is the history we make today. [Henry Ford]

Ford, arch industrialist dedicated to progress, is the epitomy of the modern vision. And where has it got us today?

What is interesting to me is how we read Jesus' parable of the wineskins to mean that new wine is good, and old bad. But I have come to feel that he may have meant quite the opposite. I have further explored that thought in new.old.wine.skins.

Post new comment

Please solve the math problem above and type in the result. e.g. for 1+1, type 2.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <em> <b> <img> <i>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options